this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
97 points (99.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3362 readers
807 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes.

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Majority of those surveyed still disagree with political violence

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Part of fascism — consolidating power in general — is ensuring that your opponents have no peaceful option left to regain power. If they resort to violence, it’s an excuse to destroy them. If they don’t resort to violence, there are still many ways to craft a casus belli to justify the purge.

We on the left spent decades trying to warn people about the fascists, but people are so incredibly stupid and hateful that they cheerfully handed over all the power to those monsters. Now it’s too late and violence is inevitable.

[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

You don’t have to be “on the left”. It’s not left versus right, it’s fucking psycho idiots versus sensible, reasonable people. The “right” is just a polite way of saying “fucking psycho idiots”.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today -5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Lol, the good old left is good and right is bad... :)

You actually think it works like that... People who vote left are wise loving human beings dedicated to saving the planet, while the right side is responsible for all the evil..

I guess thats what politics does to your mind. You actually think left vs right is good vs evil.

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Do you... just reject the idea that some positions are good and aome positions are bad, or do you object to the idea of labelling current existing positions as good or bad?

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I think splittring populations into left and right is a meaningless distinction and designed to make people pick one of those sides. In reality both sides have much more in common with eachother than the politicians on each side.

You and me right here have a lot in common right away just writing in the same thread on lemmy. Politicians stand on stage and make grand statements for votes. At least I have nothing in common with those people.

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Its a self-selected distinction , not an imposed one.

People describe their own political beliefs, they don't have a label thrust on them that they must use.

You also didn't answer either of my questions.

So you clearly have more in common with politicians than you think.

left and right is a meaningless distinction

Not really, there are fundamental differences.

the politicians on each side

There are only like, half a dozen politicians on the left, tops. Maybe you're confusing Democrats for the left? They are very much not.

[–] Quadhammer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

This is why we need every person on the right who's not too far gone to join us. Civil War will accomplish nothing accept hurting ourselves. It's us versus power not left vs right

[–] ItemWrongStory@midwest.social 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I do think it's possible to vote your way into a situation you cannot vote yourself out of.

Like, for example, the way the system is currently setup gives much more representation (and therefore power) to smaller states. To change that, we would need to amend the constitution which would require a super majority. When have institutions willingly voted to give up their unearned power?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

This reminds me of how much I hate the US's voting system. It's almost as much as I hate how complacent the general American population is about it as if it's somehow fair.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Whether people think it's necessary or not is irrelevant.

Fascism is an open expression of political violence. It needs violence, it creates violence, it supports violence, it thrives on violence.

Political violence is already here. It just may not have reached you yet.

[–] Curious_Canid@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sadly, I have to agree with this. It does not necessarily follow that the response must be violent, but we need to be honest about what's happening. Trump is already using violence against us, it's just a matter of who has and hasn't been affected by it yet.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

Also, when people talk about opposing political violence, in reality they're mostly opposing political violence spreading to the elites responsible.

Notice there was no mainstream discussion of political violence until an elite who encouraged violence got shot.

The question is how you respond.

Smart violent or stupid violent? Read your ass some (military) theory!

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

TFW the people who support genocide try to lecture you about supporting violence.

[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right, because protest voting against Harris has made everything better.

Stupid dumbfucks invited the Nazis to take unilateral power and still don't get it through their lead brains.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago

I have never voted against Harris actually, I don’t know what you mean…

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants

-Thomas Jefferson

Not exactly a new concept.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The founding fathers were a murderous bunch who tortured and killed colonist that did not agree to their hostile takeover. They engaged in terrorism and created massive propaganda campaigns full of lies and manipulation.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

A broken clock etc

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Star Wars Palpatine says Do It animation

The "majority" in the survey only think this because it hasn't impacted them yet. Once it does, they'll slowly come to terms with reality.

EDIT: I am of course, advocating for more Luigis. Just wanted to make that clear.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We need a general strike. The country would be brought to its knees if deprived of profit and labor. That tactic was extremely effective in Chile in 2019, and had they not fallen for the trick of liberal reform, they would've had a successful revolution on their hands with virtually no bloodshed.

If you aren't in a union (or even if you are, it's worth dual-carding), please consider joining the IWW to unionize your workplace (bonus: you'll get higher wages, better benefits, and more time off if you succeed!) to strengthen a general strike if we finally manage to enact one.

The UAW is planning one for May 1st 2028, but it could happen sooner.

And for our international friends, you should join one as well, as fascism is gaining momentum globally. If your country isn't listed below, just contact the IWW directly in the link above.

  • 🇦🇷 Argentina: FORA
  • 🇦🇺 Australia: ASF-IWA
  • 🇧🇷 Brazil: FOB
  • 🇧🇬 Bulgaria: ARS, CITUB
  • 🇩🇪 Germany: FAU
  • 🇬🇷 Greece: ESE
  • 🇮🇹 Italy: USI
  • 🇳🇱 🇧🇪 Netherlands & Belgium: Vriji Bond
  • 🇪🇸 Spain: CNT
  • 🇸🇪 Sweden: SAC
  • 🇬🇧 United Kingdom: UVW
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago