this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2025
309 points (99.0% liked)

Games

42632 readers
873 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hupf@feddit.org 5 points 4 hours ago
[–] Undearius@lemmy.ca 116 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Now's a good opportunity to promote Clone Hero

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Does Clone Hero have the characters dancing in the background like on regular Guitar Hero? I'm all about the immersion.

[–] Viirax@piefed.social 19 points 1 day ago
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It'll never be quite the same without the master tracks.

[–] Flatfire@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 day ago

For customs? Yeah. But pretty much every master used in the RB or GH games have been ripped and are available for use there too

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m sad I never got this to fully work with my Td 17

[–] Pupschism@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's not working? If any amount of midi is being picked up then you may need to remap, otherwise you might need drivers for the usb, or need to use a hardware usb midi box instead of usb

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

The drum functionality was new when I tried. This was years ago.

[–] MyNameIsAtticus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Man, this sucks. I haven't played any games like this in a while (i legit have my guitar hero mounted on the wall) but it sucks to see something like this going away

[–] umfk@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I've heard good things about YARG (yet another rhythm game). Basically an open source rock band clone on PC.

[–] MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Frets on Fire is the one I knew of back when Guitar hero was at its peak

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

It should not be legal for a product such as this to just cease existing due to an agreement between IP owners ending.

It's like Disney saying "We agree you can make this Mickey Mouse game using our characters, but it can only be sold for 2 years." Fucking why?

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"Because in 2 years the value of the product might be higher and we expect to always be paid more, regardless of the current deal we are making today."

~Disney, since it was established as a business

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

~~Makes sense they bought Star Wars, so they can legally say “I am altering the deal. Pray I do not alter it further.”~~

[User was moused for this comment]

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Uh oh. You quoted a Disney movie. Prepare to be litigated.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I’ve got a bad feeling about this…

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Except if you bought the game you still own a copy, they're just not allowed to sell new copies.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are a bunch of Marvel games that are exactly like this.

Somewhat related. I tried to watch Guava Island, which was apparently only made available for Amazon for a limited time, then it just disappeared.

I think it should be legal to download or stream any of that stuff that's no longer available.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's certainly ethical, if not legal.

You could make a good argument in court, too. Hard to show damages when there's no possibility of profit because you're not selling it.

[–] tmyakal 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That's actually a very bad argument in court. Taking things off the market to drive scarcity and boost sales at a later date is a normal and common business tactic. See: the McRib, Pumpkin Spice Lattes, and the Disney Vault.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

I can't name any cases off the top of my head, but I don't see a reasonable court equating hypothetical future earnings with present losses.

Like if it was "he stole my harvest of beans that I was going to sell at market" then yeah the harm is obvious, but when it's "well I'm not selling the beans now, and I'm not planning on selling them in the future, but someday I might, therefore no one else should be able to appreciate beans in the meantime" that's ridiculous. Especially since piracy is not theft; the number of beans has not changed.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think there's a difference between unavailable and limited availability.

There are some old games that may never come back. In many cases, there's no agreed owner. Imagine if something became public domain after a short period of no use (5 years, 10 years maybe).

[–] tmyakal 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Rights-holders can make these products available whenever they want. Nintendo added many old "abandonware" games to their subscription catalog that had been unavailable for much longer than ten years. If someone else is putting them out for free, they're stealing Nintendo's lunch.

There are very few cases where copyrighted material would have no owner and no legal mechanism to determine ownership.

Not saying I support the current system. I think current US copyright law is ridiculous and a net negative for our culture. Just clarifying that "Well, no one was selling it" is not a legally defensible position when it comes to copyrighted work.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It absolutely isn't a legal defense. You're right.

I'm saying it should be legal. Starting now, since digital is a standard. Nintendo needs to put it out or let people share it. They can have 10 years (or the highest of 5 years from now/10 years from when it was last available). Something like that.

The TV movie standard of everything being available should be the video game standard.

[–] tmyakal 4 points 1 day ago

The TV movie standard of everything being available

TVs and movies are not universally available. Dogma is a pretty famous case of being universally unavailable for over 15 years. It was only announced this year that a new licensing deal had been reached. There are plenty of lesser-known shows and movies that are just gone forever.

But that is a case in favor of piracy and physical media. Films like 1922's Nosferatu only survived to today because of bootlegging. If we're expecting Netflix to: one, be around as a company for 80 years until their films enter into public domain; and two, maintain their originals on their servers for that entire time, then we're setting ourselves up for some pretty big disappointments and some rather huge holes in our cultural history.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

The McRib is actually an awful example for this, because McD’s primary deciding factor is the price of pork. When pork prices drop, McD revives the McRib. They want to manufacture them as cheaply as possible. Then when the prices start to climb again, they pull it from the menu.

That’s why they don’t do big “it’s coming back on this date, and leaving on this date” announcements ahead of time, because those announcements would affect the pork prices as pig farmers would anticipate the upcoming large McD orders, and subsequent dips when they stop selling. By the time the McRib is on the menu, McD has already been buying pork for a while. And by the time it gets pulled from the menu, McD has already stopped buying a while ago. So their profit margins won’t be affected by them adding/pulling it from their menu.

[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Taking things off the market to drive scarcity and boost sales at a later date is a ~~normal~~ bullshit and ~~common~~ anti-consumer business tactic.

[–] III@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It doesn't stop existing, you just can't buy it.. Not great but not unreasonable.

Wouldn’t the solution just end up screwing artists who have to give up their song in perpetuity? You can have those buy pay way more

[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And this is why disc games should never go away.

[–] vateso5074@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Don't worry, the games industry has you covered on that now. They just release games that are broken or half-finished without the day 1 patch, but then allowing it to update removes all of the licensed content.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The digital download isn't going away either (yet).

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What like the songs or Kindle books that can be removed from your library next time your computer logs onto the Internet due to a licensing dispute?

With more games and systems requiring online access every X number of days, downloads don't mean shit.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

u keep everything you bought on rock band it has been that way since rock band 3 shut down. even when metallica was pulled from the stores absolutely nobody lost the metallica songs they had bought

[–] gramie@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago

For about 1 year my two sons and I played Rock Band, mostly The Beatles, everyday when they came home from school. At least an hour each day. We played other versions of Rock Band, but the Beatles was easily our favorite.

It directly led one of them to learn the piano and eventually get a master's degree in composing, and the other to enjoy playing in bands and performing in musical theatre.

[–] degen@midwest.social 27 points 1 day ago

So uh, happy... anniversary... I guess?

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

This is one of the weird aspects of games that seems to make no sense because of archaic laws that never entered the 20th century, nevermind the 21st. It seems to be about manufacturing new copies of the already made game, not selling them. So it only affects digital sales, I would assume because of their "creation" on a new sale, every physical game copy was already manufactured and out there, nothing changes there.

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have so many good memories of playing Rock Band in college. I just picked this up for PS4 for like $10, but it looks like the instruments are going to cost an arm and a leg...

[–] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Just like being in a real rock band!

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

End of an era 🥲

Obligatory plug: Rock Band 3 Deluxe mod, Rock Band 4 Deluxe mod
Shoutout to the Milohax team

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Too bad PS4 emulation isn't quite there yet. You can, however, pirate the fuck out of the earlier games, DLC and all. Truly a better way to play, cause that DLC was hella expensive.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Rock Band 4 does get in-game now on ShadPS4, but it's a long ways off from playable.

https://github.com/shadps4-compatibility/shadps4-game-compatibility/issues/1165

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the songs will start to become unavailable to purchase over the next 9 years. I guess it's a good reminder for me to buy all the songs I want to get.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks! I actually just bought one of the those that are delisting soon a couple nights ago. So that makes me feel better. I'll have to go through this first list tonight.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

i bought a bunch too i was going to buy just from the list then got distracted and bought a shit load of packs 😂