this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2026
771 points (98.5% liked)

196

5185 readers
1198 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same with police brutality.

Oh god, I really wish we had the Cyborg Cop from "Ultra Murderous Cyborg Cop 3000 - Extrajudical Massacre" dealing with thiefs!

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

Dudes watching Robocop be like: "fucking Murphy, stifling innovation in the name of some delusional woke agenda!!"

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not quite the same, but The Matrix and so-called "red-pilled" Republicans make me laugh every time for this reason. The Wachowski sisters have flat out and openly said that The Matrix is a transgender story about the prison of toxic masculinity and escaping it by transitioning. The red pill is Premarin, an estrogen pill from the 90s, and the blue pill is a testosterone steroid (I forget which one), both of which were produced in those exact colors. So every time a conservative talks about being "red-pilled," they're actually talking about taking estrogen.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Now the E pills are blue, thus ruining the metaphor, another crime big pharma must answer for.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 96 points 3 days ago (29 children)

Please, instead of more satirising toxic masculinity, can we have some more depictions of positive masculinity in lead roles like Aragorn from LotR?

Also, please feel free to list some good examples of positive masculinity in replies below because I and others I know could benefit from seeing more of that.

[–] Katrisia@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Many Robin Williams' characters (e.g., Dead Poets Society, Good Will Hunting, Awakenings...).

It depends on the version, but often, Gomez Addams from The Addams Family.

Waymond Wang in Everything Everywhere All at Once.

From Harry Potter and Fantastic Beasts, Hagrid and Newt Scamander, respectively.

Good-hearted heroes such as Captain America, Colossus, etc. The new Superman, probably. The Doctor from Dr. Who. Big etcetera.

[–] Katrisia@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In videogames, the latest I've seen is the protagonist of Vampire Therapist (and probably other characters too). Give that game a try, you all.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 23 points 2 days ago

I'm not sure if anyone else said, but Uncle Iroh from Avatar the last airbender.

One of the best farther figures in media. His treatment of Zuko; as Zouk is finding out who he is and what he stands for. Truly inspiring role model stuff.

Also Bandit Healer 👍

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bandit Heeler (Bluey's dad)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I love that Aaragorn is kind of unanimously agreed on as one of the best examples of positive masculinity.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Also, please feel free to list some good examples of positive masculinity

Star Trek is kinda cheating, but Picard and Riker. Although some of Riker's behaviour could be seen as "use and abuse of power for sex" in some scenarios, like hitting on people at 10 forward while serving as first officer in the ship they are in.

I still love the scene where for some reason Worf and Riker are in 10 forward, Riker is hitting on ... someone and Worf says he wants to talk to that person. Riker's reaction is basically "Oh shit, you wanted to get with her? All good my man, I'll get out the way, you know me, dime's a dozen, I fuck everyone".

EDIT : I really like the way Star trek has lots of different examples on leadership styles and how there's multiple ways of being a good leader. Even Jellico, although his way of handling a transition sucks.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Riker and Troi were in a big deal relationship before the events of TNG, and there's a scene later in the show where they are talking about their respective relationships and giving each other advice and I find that quite wholesome. It's not always easy or even possible to break up with someone and remain in contact, let alone friends, but it can happen under the right circumstances, and it's nice to see a depiction of a breakup that doesn't have to turn into enmity.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ron Swanson, and to a greater point Nick Offerman.

New movie Superman.

[–] coriza@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (9 children)

I feel like it falls to the same problem. They will see Ron Swanson, a tridimensional complex character and just flat it to the "cool macho" stuff and ignore his character growth and confuse aspects that are flaws but maybe charming or colorful to actual qualities.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheEEEdiot@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 120 points 3 days ago (10 children)

exhibit 1 : American Psycho

[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 96 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] homoludens@feddit.org 73 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 66 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Young_Gilgamesh@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Women and the folk who don't categorize themselves will never understand the deep masculane urge of self destruction. Of going down in a "blaze of glory" even if you're ultimately wrong.

The stereotype of masculinity was always a meme that drove men to destruction. The tribal warriors and knights of ye olde times idealized this type of crap too. It's been a part of humanity ever since writing was invented, probably longer. It's a strange part of being human.

[–] fracture@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i've never understood this sort of masculinity, but i also have people who need me to be alive to continue living, and i assume that changes the math (transmasc, since i figure people will wonder, and i'm fine with this being the one thing where i'm not a real man lol)

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It’s super common with young men, those who don’t have someone to “live for” but plenty of people to “die for”. No dependents, but lots of people they depend upon.

The greatest sin a man can do, in many societies, is to be an immediate burden, to take in more resources than they provide. To be a momentary net drain in material terms. Of course the pressure completely ignores emotional impact ether positive or negative, and generally discredits the material value of traditionally “feminine” work.

That’s kind of the core of a lot of misogyny and patriarchy, emotions and care are not the responsibility of men, their only responsibility is material. How others might feel when they are gone doesn’t matter, the chance to benefit them by dying, even if slim, trumps any emotional impact of them not being around, or any potential long term material benefit of them still being around.

[–] Oggyb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Can you explain your last paragraph a bit?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Walter White imperative.

why is this such a perfect explaination...

the refusal of the friends money, the "buisness" as a last resort, trying to avoid medical care to go out with a bang instead of with a whimper, the emotional segregation.... wow. it's not even what the show is mainly about but you're perfectly right

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago (6 children)

The Boys is a perfect example of this happening right now.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 88 points 3 days ago (2 children)

In this household, Shit Cumdick is an Italian American hero, END OF STORY!

Actually, come to think of it, Tony Soprano is a great example of this. The show is literally about him going to therapy because he can’t face the fact that he’s a toxic POS and he’s still lionized by a ton of people. The guy cheats on his wife on the regular, murders his own supposed friends, and is constantly just doing all manner of shithead stuff, but the morons still love him.

[–] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 60 points 3 days ago (9 children)

This is how I feel about Breaking Bad. At first, you feel kind of bad for Walt and his situation, but that should quickly chang especially as the seasons go on and he reveals how much more of a piece of shit he really is. But I also distinctly remember as people watched the show in real-time how fans would idolize Walt. Really baffled me at the time.

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 38 points 3 days ago (6 children)

This one I can actually kind of understand because the shift is gradual. Like, if you started watching in season 3, it would be quite obvious that he's a piece of shit, but if you start in season 1, the viewer establishes that he's a sympathetic character and it's hard to really identify a firm moment when he goes from being sympathetic to villain. It's like the old 'boiling water with a frog in it' analogy... The viewer (at least it was true for me) tries to justify his increasingly bad actions because he's been established as a "good guy" in the beginning until at some point they just have to step back and think, "Wow... he's actually an awful person." Then you watch the rest with a re-framed perspective.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 27 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I mean, that was the entire premise of the show, a good person who breaks bad. You are supposed to like him, and supposed to have complicated feelings about his character arc as he devolves deeper and deeper into the dark side. Of course there will be moments during the arc when you still root for him as the badass but that should all be gone by the end, when he’s just a bad guy who got a deserved end.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halfsalesman@piefed.social 36 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

My younger brother loves Tyler Durden quotes. One in particular "It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything."

I'm not sure why that one jumps out at him, dude makes more money than me. I do want to say though that hes genuinely a good person in most ways, hes completely surrounded by frothing at the mouth rightwingers but maintains that he is a centrist. And he says stuff that implies left wing and anarchist beliefs but constantly defends rightwing figures when I shit talk them around him. Most notably Joe Rogan.

Hes just badly propagandized and would end up being socially isolated if he started actually identifying as left wing because all of his friends would stop talking to him. And he refuses to move and make new friends. Its depressing.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like it will only be after he’s lost everything (his friends) that he will be able to do anything (have compassion for others and stop listening to Rogan).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

That quote in particular is an awful thing to hold dear if your brother loves you and the rest of your family. What good is this ‘freedom’ without the people most dear to you? You become a shell of yourself without the people that give meaning to your life, imo.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 31 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Oof the world is full of good examples for this. Like the Torment Nexus, in every genre. South Park is another one - there used to be real Cartman fans. Also some thought it was a children's TV show.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

Cartman is a great character and one that, despite being a complete piece of shit of a human, is likable because the stories are better with him around. He's also a great depiction of certain segments of society - arrogant, envious, greedy, self centered, manipulative, petty, sore loser, whiny, bitchy - which are too dense to realize he's supposed to be a parody of them and not a role model.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›