this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
354 points (88.8% liked)

RPGMemes

14747 readers
43 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seriously. Every form of entertainment has baked-in political assumptions, and that definitely includes #ttrpg . You might choose not to examine them, but this is an active choice on your part, and you don't get to pretend that your entertainment is "free of politics".

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rosswinn@ttrpg.network 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

RPGs, much like SF, have always been a mechanism to explore social issues in philosophy, governance, and thought. In Human society I don’t personally believe that “politics” can be avoided in any group anywhere. —of course that’s just one man’s opinion.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You can tell what someone’s politics are by what they consider political.

I was astonished at some of the Steam reviews of Outer Worlds after playing it. People proper pissed off that their experience had been ruined because there’s a female side character with an optional side quest where she wants a date with another woman. Like how thoroughly filled with hate do you have to be as a person, to be fine with all the mass killing but suddenly get a moralistic high horse about a fictional character going on a dinner date you don’t approve of.

Sad that Steam are making a comment of their own by allowing those reviews to stay up.

[–] Logical@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

While I haven't read those reviews, I think the implications of Steam removing reviews would be worse, since they would effectively be manipulating the user score of a game. User reviews are just that, user reviews. The score should indicate what users think, whatever their reasons may be for thinking it, no?

I don't disagree with the rest of what you said though.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

How DARE you make your game try to reflect reality.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

Steam definitely has a libertarian streak, seemingly. I wish I had started switching over to GOG a lot sooner.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago

I disagree, because typically it means someone is racist or sexist and just doesn't want to see people of color or queer characters. Such people may still be willing to engage with the political aspects of their gaming insofar as they may join initiatives like Stop Killing Games or argue that game devs should be treated better, but they're just bigoted assholes who can't handle people of color or queer characters.

Also don't mistake this as a defense of them. They're deplorable. I'm just saying I don't agree with the statement as written.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

What's the political assumption of pong?

I mean I don't disagree with the sentiment, the moment something has world building or a story or goals that relate to real life non-abstractly, there's at least a political assumption, potentially an intentional statement. And people just don't notice when it conforms to their world view. But politics free entertainment can exist, even if being able to engage in that entertainment necessarily requires some sort of engagement with real politic systems.

Though the most memorable games tend to be the ones very intentionally making statements anyway.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Glancing at Wikipedia for any Pong discourse. Found a likely example. Turns out Pong had a bug (read: feature) that contributed to its place as the first commercial success in video games. Quote,

the in-game paddles were unable to reach the top of the screen. This was caused by a simple circuit that had an inherent defect. Instead of dedicating time to fixing the defect, Alcorn decided it gave the game more difficulty and helped limit the time the game could be played [per payment]

So, Pong established the concept of video games systematically favouring the rich. Are we there yet, is that political enough?

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

There is still no political assumption in the game itself. Of course the moment you consider the means of acquiring it, everything touches on politics, even going to the forest and throwing a random stick, because forests existing is politics, them being accessible is politics, and you being allowed (or not) to throw a random stick is politics. That doesn't make the concept of "throw stick at target for fun" political.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Hazzard@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Closest I've got, which I'm surprised nobody has mentioned, is the very concept that entertainment is a worthwhile pursuit, and that we aren't made solely to work. Pong serves no functional utility, which is a statement unto itself.

That said, it feels a bit like a cop out to me, from what that quote is supposed to mean. I'd be content to rephrase it to "any sufficiently complex entertainment has politics in it". For example, I feel like this could almost certainly be said about stories in general, but I'd struggle to find the politics in many simple children's books, besides "children should be read to". Although the more I think about it, teaching all children to read was once quite political.

[–] stray@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Children's stories have tons of politics. They're almost always intentionally pushing a message of some kind, like "Be nice to ugly people because they might turn out to be really hot and/or magical later."

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

We are trying to indoctrinate children though

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Pong represents the slow but inevitable march towards socialism

[–] stray@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

Pong is competitive rather than cooperative, and I find that very meaningful.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ziggurat@jlai.lu 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Actually it's hard to keep politic out of RPG.

In game, politic is what makes the game more than just killing random person you know the Princess who want to escape a political marriage, the advisor looking to become the lord, the church and and the merchant guild trying to gain influence ? All of that is politics. and all of that is what makes your campaign fun.

In real-life, like any other social activity especially if you get wider than a closed circle, politics get involved, your club need to talk with the mayor to get a slot in the municipal culture centre or rent a room in a school. Moreover, RPG tend to have a bad reputation and be not correct according to conservative which make it even more political than tons of other RPG, if you let church and right-winger tell you which hobby are acceptable you won't be able to play RPG

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The politics those people wish to avoid is things like the princess wanting to escape a political marriage because she's gay

They don't mind politics just so long as it's not gender or identity politics

[–] Ziggurat@jlai.lu 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The Irony, is that while at least in my local community, the young generation includes a lot of openly neurodivergent gay/enbi players, I feel like that the reason why the theme is so sensitive for older player is that many of the older player never thought the time to question about-it, you know, the 50 year old "straight" conventionally attractive long term single who always play the other gender, may not just be too busy to date

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 19 hours ago

I'm in a pretty progressive city. My group's 60 year old man was married to his husband. The rest of us are in our 40s and I'm pretty sure wouldn't even notice same sex couples or cross dressing (though, in worlds with magic, proper transition ought to be available so no one might be able to notice anything but magician shopfronts advertising sex changes)

[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I absolutely want politics in gaming. Without it, we'd be stuck in the arcade era. Sure, sometimes I also like to zone out on puzzle games which are largely devout of it. Imagine The Witcher 1 without politics, is there even a game there?

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love politics in gaming, I loved Fallout 3, NV,4 (I still enjoyed it but to a lesser extent), Cyberpunk, and Outer Worlds 1/2. I love it when a game has multiple factions, I love when you get to really understand the politics of a fictional world, and I love stories involving politics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

only conservatives ever think about this, same goes for movies/shows with "too much inclusivity, and diversity"

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 74 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

~~This douchebag isn't exactly the most appropriate for this meme.~~

*First draft was the op crowder meme. Good on op for updating it.

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He changed it to Calvin, but this comment is hilarious now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This template really needs to die.

Edit: this was meant for the Crowder template. Calvin is cool.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

All I want is more nice unpolitical games like Bioshock or Wolfenstein

And not the woke nonsense of having female or PoC main characters.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 27 points 2 days ago

People do not all have the same working definition of "politics". Many people seem to use it to mean "overt content about contemporary issues", but that's not really a good definition.

If your game has sentient creatures with agency and desires, it has politics.

For example, if your game has a king, there's politics. Having the people accept monarchy is a political statement. It's not as hot-button as, say, having slavery, but it's still political.

You might not be surprised if your players react to a world with chattel slavery by trying to free the slaves and end that institution. The same mechanism may lead them to want to end absolute monarchy. They see something in the setting they perceive as unjust, and want to change it.

A lot of people are kind of... uncritical, about many things. They don't see absolute monarchy as "political" because it's a familiar story trope. They are happy to accept this uncritically so they can get to the fun part where you get a quest to slay the dragon. (Note that the target of killing the dragon rather than, say, negotiating or rehoming it is also political)

People then get frustrated because they feel stupid, and they're being blocked from pursuing the content they want. They just want to, for example, do a tactical mini game about fighting a big monster that spits fire. They don't want to talk about the merits of absolute monarchy or slaying sentient creatures.

It's okay to not always want to engage in the political dimension. That doesn't mean it's not there. If someone responds to the king giving you a quest with "wait, this is an absolute monarchy where the first born son becomes king? That's fucked up" they're not "making it political". It already was political.

If you present a man and a woman as monogamously married in your game, that's political. That's a statement. If you show a big queer polycule, that's also a statement. The latter will ping the aforementioned uncritical players as "political", because it's more atypical, but both are "political".

Some of this can be handled in session 0. But sometimes you learn that some people in the group have different tastes and probably shouldn't play together.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Same people who complain about Nazis being the enemy in Wolfenstein

EVERYTHING is politics. It absolutely affects every aspect of life, ESPECIALLY fascism

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

EVERYTHING is politics and the shitheads who complain are the ones who made it that way.

[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I mean sometimes I just want to take a break from thinking about it and larp as "The good guys" for a while

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 39 points 2 days ago (4 children)

"I don't want to talk about/see politics" is always synonym to "I support the status quo, and I will aggressively reject anything that goes against it".

Nothing that happens on a public space is free of politics, even when it's not controversial.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

they want something that won't challenge their preconceptions one iota. they don't care about artists crafting a story, they want slop that confirms their biases.

"Politics are genuinely fun and everyone wants to see them all the time, and the people who say they don't want to see it like it even more, they just wish they were seeing different politics." -hbomberguy

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ghost of Tsushima:

A Samurai and several of his battle-ready female companions try to reclaim their island after Mongol invasion.

I remember thinking "did they really have female warriors and lords back then who called the shots and fought alongside the men? I like the message, but a bit of realism would be nice...."

And then our brave stoic rugged Samurai literally prostrates himself in front of his lord/uncle at every opportunity constantly grovelling and professing how unworthy he is and how he seeks only to serve, and then I'm thinking "oh yeah... the stoic Samurai is a trope, they were either small militias or snivelling arms of the state."

So I'm okay with realism being bent if it means I'm not constantly questioning the values of my main character.

[–] stray@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not super familiar with either the game or Japanese history, but I found this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onna-musha

It seems that women were regarded more equally prior to confucianism.

The page for the game says:

Jin's samurai armor and katana are not historically accurate, with his armor based on that of the Sengoku period during the 16th and 17th centuries. According to Chris Zimmerman, one of Sucker Punch's cofounders, samurai armor from the 13th century was "jarring looking" and did not align with players' expectations of what samurai armor would look like.

Totally-not-samurai-looking armor:

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"Politics" or "the way one sees the world"?

Because I'm pretty sure there's a language disconnect regarding worldview.

A dev has their game reflect their worldview, and a social curmudgeon experiences political rhetoric cognitive dissonance, illustrating the incongruency and the fact that they are, indeed, a tool. ARRGHHH MUH FREEDOMS

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It's a classic case is "What I do is my world view, what you do is politics." Maybe sometimes the more radical variant "What I do is reality, what you do is politics."

You know, like the older version of that, "What I do is religion, what you do is superstition."

When talking to people, especially on the right side of the political spectrum, it's sadly quite common that people cannot separate their opinion from reality.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 hours ago

"faith based"

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I don't care about politics in my games (and shows/movies) as long as it fits into the world and into the story. A TV show examples for that is Torchwood. It has to be the most gay scify show (at least it is the most gay I know) but all of it fits together and I love the show, even as a totaly hetero/cis guy. It doesn't feel forced but is just how everything just it. Not sure if I can explain it good, hope it is somewhat to understand.

[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I haven't actually seen Torchwood, but I am skeptical that it could possibly be gayer than my beloved Sense8.

I do like that era of Doctor Who though, so maybe I should check this out for myself...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Alandrus_Sun@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 day ago

Honestly, with how things are right now politically - FAIR!

Let me roll some silly dice as a silly little guy while I ignore the prelude to another world war.

load more comments
view more: next ›