this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
655 points (99.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

11069 readers
2396 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago

I dunno Bernie. The use of the word oligarchy makes me "feel a little queasy." But I guess I agree with you.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Why does every post ive seen like this leave out amazon

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 9 points 57 minutes ago

Not defending it, but probably because Amazon isn't media or social media. Well, Prime video is media, but it's not a behemoth like Washington Post or CNN, so it's not really relevant in the same way. I think the intent is to point out that almost every information outlet the average person learns about the world from is owned by a group of people small enough to get a table at a restaurant without having to call ahead. Fallout and The Boys being bundled in with your online shopping aren't really influencing people in the same way.

[–] jaek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Bezos owns Amazon

[–] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

And if people were to try to topple the oligarchy, Dems would toss them under the bus.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Yes, oligarchs are bad. How is this controversial to you?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -1 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago)

And Dems bad!

[–] Sirdubdee@piefed.social 3 points 1 hour ago

Boycott billionaires

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 58 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

Who owns ActivityPub? No one.

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 40 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 30 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You own it too, motherfucker!

[–] albbi@piefed.ca 7 points 2 hours ago

Ah the ol' lemmy switcheroo.

[–] stinerman@feddit.online 26 points 4 hours ago

Not trying to be that guy, but ActivityPub is technically owned by the W3C. I agree with the sentiment of your post regarding the free nature of AP.

[–] Atropos@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago

You're right! This just reeks of Big ActivityPub propaganda!

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Seems like there are an awful lot of tankies here though

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Sure but watch this

Tankies suck! Stalin was a monster. China is an undemocratic oligarchy. Luigi Mangione should go shoot Kim Jong Un.

See? That's why the fediverse is better.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 0 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Yes that’s cool! But if we were in a community ruled by people who were to disagree with what you wrote you would be banned and censored the same. And some communities are too large and well in place for their userbase to be moved.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 3 points 2 hours ago

But they can't ban you from entire fediverse and that is the point.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

If not tankies, then who rules this community? I'll put it to the test. My guess is that they'll only ban me if I say something truly horrible, not merely "people who disagree".

Enshittification is all about next quarter, not reliable income. Eventually it gets so shitty that the users move.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Average American: "That won't stop me because I can't read! [Trump approval rating continues going lower]."

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

More an example of plutocracy, but definitely an example of both.

Unless he's specifically talking about corporate holdings, then it's oligopoly, not oligarchy.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 8 points 3 hours ago

It can be considered a form of oligarchy (rule by the few) where the ruling few are wealthy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutocracy

[–] fitgse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I thought it was Larry Ellison’s son that is about to own this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skydance_Media

[–] lesinge@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 hour ago

Nepoligarchy?

[–] Peacock@lemmy.zip 14 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Curious why he said Twitch vs Amazon

[–] danski@lemmy.world 68 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Because he's stating the companies they own that control the narrative. Push the views they want and downplay ones that are critical. Twitch is more relevant than Amazon for that.

[–] Peacock@lemmy.zip 17 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you that makes sense. I figured he led with The Washington Post for that exact reason but didn't really see Twitch in the same light at first.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

Media and social media.

[–] REDACTED 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Amazon is not really owned by any singular person. Yes, Bezos owns 8% of it, but he's neither CEO, nor a president of the company.

He's founder of Amazon, not owner of it.

[–] muffedtrims@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Bezos is chairman of the board for Amazon though. The CEO reports to the board.

[–] REDACTED 2 points 1 hour ago

Board members, who have to vote. He cannot unilaterally control the company.

Institutional investors like Vanguard and BlackRock own over 65% of Amazon.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

Especially since he doesn't explicitly own Amazon, of which Twitch is a subsidiary

[–] e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social 7 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

forbes just released their 40th billionaires list:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/pr/2026/03/10/forbes-40th-annual-worlds-billionaires-list-elon-musk-is-worlds-richest-person-ever-recorded/

but… their own link is 404. 🤔 interesting. suspicious coincidences one might say.
and while archive.org has multiple copies of every day, just since march 10th when the new one got released… their are no copies

[–] Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Always was.