this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
247 points (96.6% liked)

politics

29241 readers
1811 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 12 points 16 hours ago

Will they learn from it?

No. The non-voters still haven't.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Every asshole I know that voted for the pedo-in-chief will need to put in a lot of work to make amends.

[–] forkDestroyer 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Most of the ones I know are unapologetic about their support for him, when asked. They're definitely less vocal than when he started off his 2nd term, though.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

I drove through the Midwest last week and was SHOCKED to see no other political bumper stickers in 1200 miles, and only a couple of billboards, mostly for abortion. It's gone quiet, but not in a "I bet people are getting along better now" kind of quiet.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

This is so sad, that he is a rapist, and ruin the economy, takes healthcare away from people, illegally arrest immigrants, while having his Gestapo forces shoot people in the face, destroys US democracy and fail to help old allies in Ukraine didn't do it.
Even entering an illegal war and committing war crimes didn't do it.
But the gas increasing 1 dollar, that's the straw that breaks the camels back!! Except it didn't totally.

Paraphrasing:

Today 62% said they were “very confident” in their vote.
Another 21% of Trump voters said they were still “confident” in their votes but had “some concerns.”

That's a whopping 83% of Trump voters who are still OK with their vote and how things are going!!

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It's cult, and Trump knew what he was doing. He said he could shoot someone on 5th Ave and not lose any support. Now he literally admit to and rape kids and they still blindly follow him. Hell they probably offer up their own children.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, cultists tend to go all in. IIRC the heavens gate guys cut their balls off for the leader. These fuckers will swallow a gas price increase.

[–] BoosBeau@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago

Nothing is actually real until it adversely affects them.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

They control the release of these polling numbers. They control information. Anything you are hearing from a "source" is curated.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 101 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Here's the important number:

Just 5% said they regret their vote and would vote differently if they could.

[–] PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

That's the important part. Only 5% regret their vote. Most people in this thread who are celebrating and laughing, only read the headline.

This kind of "told you so!" stuff and thinking they were untouchable is what led to the Democrats loss. And will again if people aren't careful. People need to stop thinking "Not Trump!", because that doesn't win elections. Dems need to come up with some good candidates who are more than just "not Trump."

[–] criscodisco@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The party is losing support poll after poll after poll, and they think attacking leftists is going to help. The polls are screaming that they are going in the wrong direction, and they are completely obsessed with Hasan Piker right now. There is a coordinated effort going on across social media that is so sad and obvious. They are flailing and crashing out and it’s pathetic. I’ve never seen a party more outwardly hostile to its own voters than the mother fucking Democratic party. The Republicans at least feign like they care about their voter’s desires (mostly because they just tell their voters what they want).

[–] PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The party is losing support poll after poll after poll, and they think attacking leftists is going to help.

Yep, just now, in another thread I was accused of being being propaganda. LMAO All because I said that back in 2024, Lemmy was even more hostile to people who criticized the Dem party than they are now. It was wrong to do then, and wrong to do now lol

Democrats just can not accept responsibility for what happened for some reason. It's always a blame game.

They need better candidates or shit's gonna get even worse. How hard is it to find someone under the age of 60, and who has independent forward-thinking ideas and cares about the public?! WTF?! I like AOC, but I am not hearing any talk of them putting her in the running, so no clue what they are gonna do. But election is only 2 years away. They need to start doing something.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago

The Democratic party isn't there to represent left-wing voters. They're there to make sure that left-wing voters don't get represented by any party

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Before any Centrist disagree, ask yourself who's currently the president and why. Ask yourself if centrism is a viable strategy for stopping Trump and candidates like Trump based on the evidence, not the common knowledge that's been disproven

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's possible that some of them don't want to admit to a stranger that they'd change their vote.

But, most of it is probably choice-supportive bias or post-purchase rationalization. They believe they're smart, right-thinking people and that they couldn't have made a horrible mistake, so they look for reasons to feel like they made the right choice, despite all the evidence against it. They're supported by a whole group of propaganda networks that explain away every bad thing that Trump does and shift the blame to democrats, liberals, trans people, immigrants, non-whites, women, etc.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's possible that some of them don't want to admit to a stranger that they'd change their vote.

Surely it's more likely that Trump voters who have changed their minds don't want to admit that they were previously Trump voters?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Also possible.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

We’ve heard this from their own mouths. They may feel regret, but they have learned no lessons and have clearly stated they would do it again. These people are evil beyond redemption.

[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 53 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Another hopeful sounding headline telling us all what we want to hear.

Meanwhile in the text of the article:

When given a chance to recast their 2024 votes, in fact, just 84% of Trump voters said they would vote for him again

Just 84%?!

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's still a massive loss of support. In a free election, that would mean one of the worst election losses in history.

[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 10 points 1 day ago

I see your point but I guess part of me really wants to see evidence that more of the maga cult has come to their senses. 84% still being willing to vote for him again damages my view of my fellow americans even more.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

If you ever see a free election again, tell it I said hello.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that would mean one of the worst election losses in history.

That's just because of the stupid way elections work IN USA, not because there has been a massive change in the opinion of the population. Theoretically you can get ALL the seats in congress with 51% of the vote, if they are distributed right.

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

I did specify a free election.

Republicans are doing everything they can to make sure that this November is even less free than normal.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What a sad bunch of simple minded morons

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Pfft yeah right. Child rape didn't do it and nothing else will either.

[–] jinni@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Buyer's remorse is a tough pill to swallow when you’re the one who bought the pharmacy.

And when literally everyone else told you that you would be an unfathomable idiot to buy it.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 46 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Here are the percentages of 2024 Trump voters who disapproved of him in each of these areas:

  • Gas prices: 45%

Does that mean that the majority of Trump voters approve of Trump's gas prices? A nation of masochists, apparently.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

High gas prices are a pittance if we can bring Jesus back! (I wish this were a joke).

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If he can turn water into wine, then by god we can waterboard that Palestinian until he turns it into ethanol for our cars.

[–] FoxyFerengi@startrek.website 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There was an article a few weeks ago where folks were interviewed at a gas station in Pennsylvania. Two of the Trump voters who was fine with the higher prices said it was an acceptable price to pay to keep the nation safe. They really thought Iran was going to attack the US, possibly with nukes.

I have no hope of changing the minds who fervently believe in that crap

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We shouldn't focus on changing the minds of people who are clearly not capable of that, instead you focus on making their opinions irrelevant

[–] ZombieChicken@reddthat.com 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Their opinion is relevant?

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 16 hours ago

We're hostages to their opinion

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Some of his supporters will accept anything with a smile as long as it's their side doing it. Some are so drowned in right wing media bullshit that they might as well be living in a parallel universe. And some will just be so averse to criticizing Trump (particularly in a poll which is likely to have political remifications) that they'll defend or ignore almost anything bad, even if they do hate it.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 points 1 day ago

Yep. Just like some are only on the Trump train because they're afraid of the social ramifications of saying anything bad about him.

In some circles, saying a single bad word about Trump will get you ostracized, shunned, and perhaps even targeted by violence.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

"It's a sacrifice we have to make to get _______"

They just have to convince themselves that every bad thing is worth it in the long run because Trump is doing such a wonderful job on "X". Their propaganda channel / site of choice just tells them why their sacrifice is necessary.

[–] null@lemmy.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't believe it for a second. Any real-life person I know who supported Trump is still fully bought in. Don't confuse fewer flags and hats as less support, it just means people are poorer now than they were before.

[–] ZombieChicken@reddthat.com 1 points 13 hours ago

Some of them may still vocally support him to save face (admitting an error is a sin to these people), but could very well regret it deep down.

[–] modestmeme@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

They’ll vote again for him and his ilk. Being unhappy doesn’t make you admit you’re wrong. Also, the weight of gas prices doesn’t compare to the pleasure of inflicting cruelty on the non-white “others”…

[–] redlemace@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Now already? /s Better late than never, hope they manage to turn the tide for them selves. Trust and respect from the rest of the world will take deccades (if ever) but they will never ever regain the position they once had.

[–] Janx@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

They will never vote for anyone who doesn't have an 'R' next to their name on the ballot. That should say it all...

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

if november elections happen (big if), he's gonna rig them big time. We all know that.

Because, otherwise, if he wins again, and does it fairly, the US deserve to become a big north korea.

[–] br0da@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Not that I put anything past this administration, but in order for him to “win again” we would need to rewrite the constitution as the 22nd amendment specifically bans more than two terms of a presidency. I’m not saying he won’t try because they are indeed deplorable monsters.

[–] TastehWaffleZ@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They’re referring to midterm elections which are happening this year

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Oh wait,I didn't think he'd hurt me! He was only supposed to hurt the people I hate."

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago

"He's not hurting the people he's supposed to be hurting!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›