this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
626 points (97.4% liked)
Fuck Cars
11798 readers
1605 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(Seriously tho those wide urban highways split up a city as much as a river does. It looks like the Hudson in NYC with those massive bridges).
I'm too lazy to do that, but maps of Texan cities where their highways were edited to water bodies would really prove this point.
Displacing minorities is a feature. Otherwise Those People might build up generational wealth, and eventually start considering themselves white people’s equals. POSIWID.
TIL a new acronym, but one doesn't need to infer the purpose of the system from what it does. The designers of the system said out loud that segregation was a feature. They gave speeches and wrote memos about it.
But hear me out, what if the train was powered by coal and suffering?
I'm here trying to figure out if you mean that the train is powered by suffering and coal, or if you mean the train is suffering, and it is powered by coal.
I'm probably focusing on the wrong thing, but it feels important.
Land is more important than people. That’s why Wyoming gets the same number of senators as California.
See, what happened is Texas heard something about bullets and got a bit ahead of itself.
Steal stolen land, you mean.
Steal land. Sell it. Let the locals improve it. Steal it again. Sell it. Let the locals improve it. If anyone complains, tell them that you shouldn't care about the latest set of owners because they bought it off you when you stole it from the last set of owners.
Don't ask who profits. It's definitely not six families who showed up wealthy and have only ever been getting richer for the last century.
If it was a new interstate or an extra lane on the Katy freeway, nobody would be saying shit. My favorite example is how there's in interstate project in the northeast that's pretty much as overbudget as CAHSR and basically nobody is talking shit about it.
what, railway? no no, this is a superhighway for coupled-car vehicles!
I don’t know that that’s an “average Texan,” I think that’s more “average massively wealthy landholding Texan.”
Certainly is average Texan voter. They vote for this.
(Although they’ve mostly been indoctrinated from a young age so the blame is more on the corpocratic state elite than the population).
I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeepublicans
Racism mostly...