this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2025
1159 points (99.3% liked)

memes

16011 readers
2484 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net 164 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Telescopes cause autism, got it.

[–] mrmhm@lemmy.world 102 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Radio telescopes are notorious for that because they're on the far end of the spectrum.

They’re literally a tool designed for hyper fixating.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

As they say take my upvote and GTFO.

[–] MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So...what I'm getting is

we need to make space illegal?

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Quad City DJ's are in danger

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No no, you've got it the wrong way round: autism causes telescopes

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Autism telescopes causes, got it.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 1 week ago

No, no no, it should be; causes autism telescopes.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

I thought it was the planets that were making autism.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Please don’t give ‘em ideas…

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wonder what happened in the 1890s to scare that many left-handed people back into hiding..

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My late 70's experience probably didn't help. My first grade teacher tied my left hand to the desk. The next year they stopped doing that. I later found out the school district lost a long ongoing lawsuit and it hit them where they kept their heart. In the wallet.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My grandmother had her left hand tied to her high chair or behind her back by her mother before she even went to school. People are fucked up.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've heard the stories. Thing is some of the most creative people I've ever met were left handed.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Ain't that what they say? That creative people are left-handed? 😁

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's the general thing yeah, but I'm pretty sure that they were already doing that BEFORE the dip..

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Probably the same reason there's so much more breast cancer since the invention of the mammography machine.

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wasn't Pluto "discovered" around the time autism was first "diagnosed"?

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Aha! So it was Pluto causing autism and the push to reclass it as a dwarf planet was an attempt to reduce its power!

[–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The Science Vs. podcast just did an episode on this.

https://open.spotify.com/episode/2eKgmLJZrEKTbVzCVYzp0u

Spoiler: It's exactly as the meme describes. Autism rates are rising not because more people are becoming autistic, but because we’ve expanded the definition and improved how we recognize and diagnose it.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

improved how we recognize and diagnose it.

Well, we at least have changed how we recognize and diagnose it, I'm not totally convinced it's 100% an "improvement". We've kind of jumbled up a whole bunch of people under a common umbrella and diluted the implications of the term, to the point where it tells you negligible practical information when someone is described as "autistic" or "on the spectrum".

[–] Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's a totally fair concern and is one of the points the episode addresses. Researchers acknowledged that the definition has broadened, but they also emphasized that it reflects a better understanding of autism as a spectrum. It does make the label less specific, but it's also helped a lot of people. Especially women and people of color. It helped them get more accurate diagnoses instead of being misdiagnosed or ignored.

Overall, it's a stat worth celebrating as it means more people are getting the support they needed all along.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I hope that's the net result, just afraid that so many others will be dismissive of someone asserting autism, particularly with certain folks seeming to think being autistic is a license to be inconsiderate while claiming it also means you are smart and so is worth declaring a self-diagnosis.

[–] pachrist@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

hey guys! If we stop testing for covid, the number of covid cases will go down!

slowbro.pcx

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

This is so on point it kinda hurts.

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 7 points 1 week ago

I remember having a discussion woth someone many years ago who vehemently insisted that mental illness didn't exist until the late 1900s and that nobody were mentally ill nor dealing with disorders before psychology was invented. His conclusion was that mental illness and disorders were made up by psychologists to make money off of people.

Some levels of stupid are so severe that you just can't do anything but sit and stare in disbelief after awhile.

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

somebody get that graph of left handed people

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago
[–] propaganja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

"Probably"? Can someone point me in the direction of something slightly more conclusive? Cuz it could be that.. but I could totally also believe that it's chemicals and shit in our food and environment.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago

Have you thought maybe there was just some errant cheese on the stench coil?

Everytime a magat brings this up I always hit them with the counter conspiracy that it’s the microplastics

People still believe that long debunked "study" Wakefield did? it's because autism is more recognised now. my mom recently got diagnosed and she's in her 50s

[–] plyth@feddit.org -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Do we know if autism is genetic? Otherwise the question is not entirely wrong. There could be a cultural influence that we should figure out.

[–] ewenak@jlai.lu 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whether autism is genetic is not related to the question at all. More people are diagnosed with autism because we have better tests now than before and we test more kids.

And finally we also broadened what is considered autism.

[–] plyth@feddit.org -1 points 1 week ago

Whether autism is genetic is not related to the question at all.

How do you know? It can be both.

[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I wouldn’t be surprised if one of the factors is ‘we stopped beating kids’. Back in ye olden days, they’d hit kids until they stopped being ‘weird’. You obviously can’t do that today.