this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2025
523 points (98.0% liked)

Not The Onion

17275 readers
2023 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 4 points 5 hours ago

I was on her side until I read the article. She chased this person an unspecified distance in her car, blocked the chicken killer's car with her own, then attempted to open their car door, before settling on macing them.

Fuck that impatient chicken killer but you don’t get to do a road rage for some vigilante justice. This was just two psychopaths being brought together by circumstance.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 10 points 14 hours ago

Ngl, that would likely be me.

Not just because I like chickens, though that's a factor.

In my neighborhood, if you go the posted speed limit going one direction in the section that my house is on, you'd be going slow enough to be able to correct and not hit an animal. Going the other direction, as long as you don't slam the pedal down, it's the same.

So anyone hitting any critter with the possible exception of squirrels is 99.9~% likely to be doing something they shouldn't. I've gotten in altercations about it before because we have not just a lot of pets in the area, but kids. So some fucking moron is going to hear about out when they're showing exactly how fucking stupid they are.

But, I also happen to kinda know all the neighborhood chickens. Not necessarily on a first name, come her for petting basis, but I know which birds live where. Since I also have my own, and would gladly curb stomp any motherfucker that fucked with them, I would likely at least lay hands on a motherfucker for killing any of the neighborhood birds by being a moron. I'm old, but my tolerance for fuckery like that keeps getting lower as I age.

Accidents do happen, but some jackass trying to be all badass by speeding in a residential area can fuck right off and die. And yes, I'm talking about you, Robert, you absolute prat. Jackass. Done told you once. Fuckwit.

Anyway, yeah, chances are high the lady was justified as long as the dude is still alive

[–] dukatos@lemmy.zip 18 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Deserved... It could be a child instead of chicken.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 19 points 13 hours ago

in this case, this is especially relevant

The woman stopped to let the chicken cross the road, so there was clearly something happening and obviously some sort of reason that this person was stopped in the road, and the driver behind them sped around and hit the chicken. that 100% could have been a pet or infant or child instead

The woman who hit the chicken made the explicit decision to ignore the warnings that were evident, and still hit something. fucking abhorrent behaviour

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 19 hours ago

Yeah you want to avoid hitting children if you can help it. They are really big and make a mess.

[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I was taught by my driving instructor to not try and avoid smaller animals because swerving or sudden breaking would be more likely to result in a major accident than simply plowing through it. Whereas larger animals medium sized dog for example could lead to a wider accident if you hit them.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 12 points 13 hours ago

that's relevant on the highway, not residential neighbourhoods

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago

The driver was able to avoid the car stopped in the road to let the chicken cross. Instead of stopping behind them and waiting, they pulled out to cut around the stopped car.

I see this kind of behaviour all the time in my neighbourhood, at a crosswalk with a “kids crossing” sign and curb barriers designed to keep people from cutting around on the right. If someone is stopped to make a left hand turn, they cut on the right anyway, and if someone is stopped to let a kid or an animal cross (animals cross there all the time), they cut on the left.

People have been hit at that intersection. But people still keep doing it.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You should be aware enough of traffic around you to know if slamming the brakes on presents a significant hazard. (And if you can't react to an animal appearing in the road you're likely driving too fast for the visibility and conditions)

[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Luckily I've never had to turn a cat inside out, but they frequently dart out infront of vehicles close enough that slamming on the breaks won't do much even at low speed. I have a friend who's cat died on a stretch of road that had a 30 km/h speed limit.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

the first time i read the sentence i thought it said children.

Buk buk.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 12 points 19 hours ago

But... Why was the chicken crossing the road? 🤔

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

lol, her expression says it all, "Worth it, 10/10 would mace that bitch again."

Might do a little jail time but the chicken killer will think twice. I mean, christ, you live in Key West. Get on island time already.

[–] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Also I'm pretty sure the chickens are legally protected in Key West.

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh no shit, it's a thing? So that might not have been someone's chicken, it was Key West's chicken? If so, the "perp" is going to be fine.

[–] butwhyishischinabook@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Oh I guess I assumed it wasn't just someone's chicken, the article isn't clear really.

But yeah it's a thing if they're the wild ones I think. https://www.tampabay.com/archive/1999/05/30/protected-by-law-chickens-rule-the-roost-in-key-west/

[–] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago

If reincarnation is real I want to come back as a Key West Chicken.

"They have no natural enemies on this island. We need some hungry foxes. . . . The cats won't touch them. The chickens are meaner than anything."

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 13 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

The driver was a first time Skyrim player

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 8 points 19 hours ago

AND STAY THE FUCK OUT OF RIVERWOOD!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The chicken didn't cross the road, but still made it to the other side.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Ok, that wins best chicken crossing the road joke ever.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 1 day ago (5 children)

i cannot put into words how much i despise people who don't see anything wrong with crushing animals with their car, it's so fucking gross and IMO should disqualify them from handling a heavy vehicle.

It's no different than shooting animals with a gun (proper or airsoft or whatever), which i think any sensible person would agree should bar you from owning guns.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 26 points 1 day ago (12 children)

It's no different than shooting animals with a gun (proper or airsoft or whatever), which i think any sensible person would agree should bar you from owning guns.

I think there's quite a big difference between senselessly running over an animal and shooting one with a gun. I mean hunting for food and animal population control are kinda necessary in a lot of situations, while running over an animal isn't.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 22 hours ago

Tbf it's also safer to hit the animal in many cases than slam on the brakes and possibly get rear-ended or swerve into possible dangerous hazards like other cars or poles. Many driving schools actually teach that it's often the safest option unless the animal itself is big enough to be a hazard like a deer or moose.

Doing either out of malicious intent is the problem, but then again doing just about anything out of malicious intent is a problem lol. It's more about the intent than the action.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] MonkRome@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Not sure I agree with the second take. Anyone that eats meat should be ethically required to take an animals life they will eat at some point so they directly know what it means to eat meat. If someone is uncomfortable with the thought of taking an animals life, why are they eating meat and paying someone else to do their dirty work?

I eat meat, but probably not as much as most people. I have butchered livestock and hunted in the past, taking an animals life is not a pleasant thing to do.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 166 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

The way this kind of animal murder is normalized for drivers is beyond disturbing. Imagine a cyclist who came upon some birds blocking the cycle path, pulled out a pocket knife, and started stabbing them so they could get through 20 seconds faster.

It's the same psychopathic "might makes right" mentality that makes people turn a blind eye to the needless, systemic, unfathomable horrors of animal agriculture.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I have a Belgian Malinois, which, if you're not aware, is basicallythe breed of dog used by military and police that aren't German Shepherds. They are absolute maniacs of dogs, full of all kinds of prey drive and herding instincts and such that have long-since been bred out of your average family pet.

So for a while when I still had a Facebook I followed a couple of Malinois pages to help me better understand what was going on in my dog's head.

Now some malinois owners are great, they understand the reasons why their dogs are the way they are and understand how to manage them properly.

Others are absolute assholes who just wanted the really cool supersoldier dog that can run up walls and eat bad guys, and don't really do anything to channel that energy properly

I remember one post in particular of some guy's dog "playing" with a turtle, picking it up, throwing it around, etc.

I'm a dog owner, I've at times dabbled in hunting, I'm an environmentalist and conservationist, I know what sort of laws are out there and what is and isn't allowed. And people are stupid and make entirely too much information about themselves available online.

So I could see from this guy's profile what state (and in fact what city he was in, what high school he went to what company he works for, etc.)

And I could easily Google what the laws in that state are

And lol and behold, allowing your dog to harass wildlife is not allowed in that state. There were fines, potentially prison time, the officials could even take your dog and have them destroyed over this. I think it might have even been legal, maybe even encouraged, in that state for anyone witnessing this happening to just shoot your dog on the spot.

I of course wasn't about to report this guy over this, I didn't want his dog put down or anything, I just wanted him to be a better, more responsible dog owner, so I pointed this out in the comments, that were, up until that point, mostly just other assholes jerking each other off over how cool malinois are.

He, of course, quickly took the past down after that.

But not before a whole bunch of people got really pissy about me looking at his profile (to see the information about himself that he made publicly available I guess?) and taking the time to Google the relevant laws in his state so that I could point out exactly why what he was doing wasn't just morally wrong but actually illegal.

There were disturbingly few people commenting on that post who were simply angry that this jackass was letting his dog fuck with a turtle.

As an aside, my dog is a rare "lazy" malinois. She's still more energetic and driven than pretty much any other dog I've ever met, there's a part of her that definitely wants to eat someone's face, but she's content to sleep on the couch all day instead. She definitely would chase some rabbits, deer, foxes, squirrels, etc. given the chance (I don't give her the chance,) and she's never seen a turtle, but she seems to like just sniffing and occasionally licking frogs and toads (I try not to let her, but she occasionally finds them before I do on our walks, the amphibians seem mildly annoyed by this, but not enough to hop away from her, and I make sure to get her away from them ASAP so that they can continue frogging undisturbed.)

Your dog is chill because of the regular frog licking, having achieved inner dog balance through psychedelics lol

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Am I allowed to steal "lol and behold"? I want this to become a thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And then you wonder, "Why was the chicken crossing the road in the first place?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

20 years ago I was driving on a 50mph road and there was this group of about 20 birds drinking water around a large puddle right on the side of the road.

Something spooked them just in the moment that I was driving by them. In that split second, they all swarmed right in front of my vehicle smashed into the side and front. As I looked back in the mirror through the feathers floating in the air, I could see at least six or seven birds injured on the road behind me. It made me sick to my stomach and I still have this image in my head years later haunting me.

I can't imagine someone would do that on purpose.

[–] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It wasn't your fault. You would have avoided it if you were able. Therefore it is not on your moral plate. Be at peace.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sometimes, animals just don't understand how cars works. I was going to work one morning, and a jackrabbit was in my lane...it ran away, but in a way that would ensure it would get crushed if I sped up. It was only after about quarter of an mile that it decided to leave my lane...only to u-turn back into it.

THUMP

Sometimes, life is fleeting, without reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It took me coming to the comments to notice that the word in the headline was chicken, not children. I was about to go OFF about those cops.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago

You still can. They suck.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 98 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When I was a kid there was a turtle on a bridge, my mom stopped so I could move it off the bridge. Some asshole swerved to hit it while I was walking towards it. I picked up a rock and threw it at his car I was so mad.

[–] draughtcyclist@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

This is what people are missing here. She was stopped, he whipped around her and crushed the bird because he was an impatient dick. Fuck that guy.

Sorry to hear about the turtle. I've had the same thing happen to me while cycling. Maybe they all need bear mace.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›