this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
178 points (99.4% liked)

Fuck AI

4219 readers
654 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 60 points 5 days ago

If i hear any AI voice while listening to music, i'm unsubbing and take my business elsewhere.

[–] remon@ani.social 36 points 4 days ago

Yes, let's bring back the dumbest feature of radio that no one asked for ...

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 44 points 5 days ago

I’m testing not using YouTube music by not using YouTube music. So far it has been working flawlessly. Couldn’t recommend it enough.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 30 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Who the F wans this? Have they actally asked a single real user about this before starting to implement this?

[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Can I be honest i think it could be fun if it wasn't made by the evil company is aggressively anti-consumer.

I've enjoyed the games from the Grand Theft Auto series in the past and you can load custom music files that will show up as "Self Radio" which included a radio host that would poke fun at the nature of the radio station.

That said I'm pretty sure that YouTube's ones will just be Hocking s*** so I'm not down for it.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Who the F wans this?

Shareholders

I wonder if part of it is paying for less streams. However many minutes an hour this interrupts, times the number of users, would surely equal a bit of dough.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Only the stupid and gullible ones.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 16 points 5 days ago

Nobody wants this just as nobody wants those horrible auto-dubs of videos.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

They were told they have to use AI so here we are

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

You cant really believe that Google is working in the interest of the user do you? Literally the only thing they care about is shareholder expectations. As long as AI is the hype, they will push it, no matter the opinions of users.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

But how is pissing off users promoting shareholders expectations?

As long as shareholders believe that the stock price will go up, they dont mind pissing off users. And shareholders just really believe in AI growth stories sadly. Its self fulfilling prophecy.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Jesus, the whole reason for me paying a subscription is for easy access to music without the annoying banter of a radio host.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hahahahahahaha!

They called me crazy for using yt-dlp, buying music from bandcamp, and using VLC on my phone all the time instead of online music streaming...

Vindication!

[–] _druid@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

Same, I will gladly spend money on storage for my files. Paying to have an algorithm select my music for me, or agreeing to listen to ads, is anathema.

[–] kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Google takes always anti user decisions. From small things like shoving in the cast button permanently in the playback UI of YT Music to depriving users of options (no third party clients, second rate Wear OS app, no light mode, no lossless audio, geographical restrictions on tracks(which for those same tracks don't appear on other music services)) ; it is like Google wants users to pirate.

I paid for YT Premium because I used YT Music and YouTube was just a plus (the official YouTube app is a shill, asking to tip a creator or super thank or join membership. Like no thanks, I already paid once. Not to mention, even simplistic things like choosing a default video quality is impossible in YouTube mobile app. What the heck is Data Saving and High; give me granular controls.)

If Google continues to enshittify even the music service, I will just pirate (I tried Spotify but this post will become another rant if I list it's shortcomings).

[–] starchylemming@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

thats why i have offline music for mobile use and when browsing on desktop like half of my Firefox extensions are specifically for youtube only lol

from blockig sponsor segments, getting the dislike button back to disabling automatic translations of titles. there is a Firefox addon for everything

not using it personally but there is an addon to auto select higher quality streams afaik

[–] kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 days ago

Yes, I have 4 add-ons for YouTube only (3 for youtube and one to change UI of YTM, technically a tamper monkey script).

addon to auto select higher quality streams

I meant on their mobile app. On web, there are ways. But on mobile, there is none officially. I have to manually select the 1080p thingy there. Ironically, New pipe has option for custom video stream for both wifi and mobile data.

YouTube conducts so many useless experiments on their app from so called AI assisted summaries to what not, but can't factor in basic things. Today, I bolted back to Tubular ( Newpipe fork) and the simple UI with only subscriptions is a sight to behold (no shorts, option to hide comments, sponserblock integration and not to mention, no furthur IAPs). If a paying user has to resort to 3rd party alternatives, then the situation is really grim (the only thing YT app officially has is 1080p Premium bit rate but it rarely went there automatically for me).

[–] count_dongulus@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Spotify does it already with the fake DJ guy.

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 days ago

I tried that once not realizing that it would be some fake guy talking to me and never used it ever again. If I want inane chatter from some jack off I’d listen to the regular radio again.

[–] thesmokingman@programming.dev 3 points 4 days ago

It genuinely infuriates me that you can’t do those specific mixes without the stupid fucking voice.

[–] Denjin@feddit.uk 5 points 5 days ago

At least it gets out of the way while the music is actually playing. It's just a very shit algorithm

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 13 points 5 days ago

That sounds terrible and I absolutely do not want that.

🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️

[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

only if it's like the DJ and ads from GTA San Andreas.

I want the female DJ from Queens of the Stone Age. Not Kip Kasper, though!

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

TIL it's 2025 and there are people out there paying for YouTube, lmao.

[–] lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I paid for it for a while, because I wanted to support the creators. But when they started doing that "Just a dollar more bro" scheme and increased the price time after time, I bailed out.

Most creators are on Patreon now, anyway.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

insert meme of Wolverine staring longingly at a picture of DJ Atomika from SSX 3