Political Humor

Then you have cases like the one in Tennessee, where a trans woman did this to protest not being given an accurate drivers license. The police responded by arresting her for exposing female breasts. And then they threw her in a men's prison.

There is a long precedent in the law of treating trans people as male or female, whichever will hurt them most in the moment. That's the standard for most conservatives. "We'll treat you right now as whatever sex would hurt you the most, and we won't care about being consistent about it."

4d chest*

Can it be reused? Like, double it and give it to the next person?

Ironically, one of the side effects of using testosterone - commonly used for men with low testosterone - is breast tissue growth.

Surgery to remove it would be a double whammy of (CIS) gender affirming care.

Exactly. We've had this in Canada for ages. In my 40 years I've seen exactly one woman exercise that right, but they still ought to have it.

Fellas, is it gay to like tits?

Trans women by and large have fantastic boobs.

Source: my chest and my bathroom mirror.

From this I can conclude that you are male.

Just had to include "uncensored" as a term in your search and search images with blur off. I assume you're just looking for boobies, and not looking for uncensored pictures and unbiased, accurate news reporting in the same place.

Unfortunately I think the people who most need to understand why you'd be jealous, as well as why these gals would hold up "don't destroy us plz" signs while being all attention grabbing, will not be answering the phone.

I was raised in 80s and 90s maga world before it had a brand. And there are two things that I consistently see them do, which makes a lot of sense vis-a-vis the recent saying about conservatism having the in group the law protects and the out group it binds. It is these two things that blind them to the various messages of human rights. (there's a depressing sentence to honestly write about real people I know)

First they generalize, caricaturize, and exclude. They lump in these non-cis protesters right along with the non-christians, non-straights, non-whites, and various other "why can't you just be a normal person" rest of humanities.

The racism, bigotry, and LGBT+phobias are a convenient way to narrow down one's perceived size of the "in group" candidate pool, which obviously still includes them. They are not in the leopards' food chain. Obviously.

The second thing they do is conform. It goes hand in hand with the bigotry of course, but it also has to do with the fucked up psychology that goes into keeping up appearances and covering up the family's skeletons so that you always look like one of the in-group. Like if your princess needed an abortion, not only was HER's obviously the rare moral one, but nobody needs to know about it because she has her whole future ahead of her!

That's just tribalism, sure. And conservatives are bad about it in general, yes. But they can be REALLY bad about it when it comes to money, because they hate poor people. Even if they are poor. Because they need somebody to look down on. But even "good folks" can be rebranded as "poor white trash" if they don't maintain the perceived standards of the in-group.

Wilhoit's law:

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

After writing this post I'm thinking Wilhoit's law might just exactly right, so there's the text.