this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
696 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

70365 readers
5296 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 287 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Maybe asking advertisers to 'go fuck yourselves' isn't such a bright idea, fuckwit.

[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You can also have friends if you just pay mercenaries to kidnap them from the street at gunpoint. Many many great friends at any time.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (4 children)

You just know that's going to be exhibit 1 for the defense.

Fucking fascist Nazi man baby doesn't like when advertisers do what he tells them, and then continues to do so when he realizes that was a bad idea.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 182 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I’m honestly blown away that Nestle stopped or reduced advertising. It seems like twitter is exactly the home for such a terrible company.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 78 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Not if there's fewer there to see ads. They're still a business with a bottom line, even if what they do is terrible.

[–] UnpopularCrow@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] viking 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The company might be terrible, but most of their buyers are normal people who either don't know what brands belong to them, or don't care enough to carefully investigate everything they buy. And those normal people are the ones the ads need to reach. If they leave twitter, what's the point of advertising there?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] missingno@fedia.io 151 points 3 months ago (3 children)

All the defense has to do is play the clip of him openly telling advertisers not to advertise and he'll get laughed out of court.

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Most politicians are bought for less than a million. The guy has hundreds of billions. I imagine he can buy a few judges along the way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org 31 points 3 months ago

In an actual court? In Trumps america?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 127 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You know you've fucked up when even Nestlé doesn't want to work with you...

Obligatory Fuck Nesté

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When people go we may use child slaves in our supply chain, steal and ruin water supplies, and bribe medical professionals to get discourage breastfeeding, but you're too fucked up for us to work with then you know you've fucked up.

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To be clear, its not that twitter is too fucked up for nestle to work with, they absolutely would if they thought it would benefit them. Its that twitter has become so toxic that they see advertising there as a net negative.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 113 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The lesson here is to never start advertising on that platform. You’re less likely to be sued by Musk if you never start advertising in the first place. Advertising on his platform is an unnecessary risk for your business:

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 37 points 3 months ago

Preach. Never do business with a professional troll.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 81 points 3 months ago (11 children)

Can someone explain to me how you can sue over a business choosing to not spend their advertising dollars on a particular service? I mean Elon specifically told his customers to “fuck off” and now he’s suing them?!? I just don’t understand these petulant little man children being so litigious when they get their feefees hurt.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 63 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Easy, you pack courts with shills, you eliminate government oversight, and then you do whatever you want.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The actual "easy" part is that you can sue anyone for pretty much anything. Suing is entirely different from winning the case.

Why they think they have a chance of winning is the weirder question, especially when Musk publically told the advertisers to go fuck themselves.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don't have to win, just drag the case out, causing both sides to spend fortunes on legal fees. Guess who has the most money.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

X has an estimated market cap of $9.4 billion, whereas Nestlé has a market cap of $219 billion. That's a corporate superpower with no qualms about monopolizing freshwater or bait- & switching breast milk formula from babies. And it's just one of the companies they're taking on, with a shitty case to boot. So yeah... if I was Elon I would keep my head down.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 80 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Nothing says you believe in free market competition more, than suing another private business, trying to force them to give you money

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Railison@aussie.zone 77 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How long until Tesla sues me for buying a Toyota?

[–] 01189998819991197253 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Currently scheduled for 18th of March.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 75 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I didn't know Citizens United gave companies forced speech.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 66 points 3 months ago (10 children)

Can you please tag this elon, so that our spam filters work?

It's not practical to censor "x"

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 58 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Last year he told everybody to go fuck themselves. Now he's crying. If there is somebody who needs to be deported, is it his narcistic, selfish, apartheid's ass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rusticus@lemm.ee 50 points 3 months ago

Hey Elmo, you told the advertisers to “go fuck yourself” in no uncertain terms, even repeating yourself for dramatic effect.

Hey I’ve got an idea Elmo. Go fuck yourself.

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 49 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In a sane world, this lawsuit would be laughed out of court.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's harder to laugh it out of court when the plaintiff is in the government himself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

If suing companies for not advertising on your platform made any sense, porn sites could sue almost the whole economy.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"I ruined my business by supporting Nazis and it's all your fault!"

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Musk is not just supporting Nazis, he is a flaming Nazi himself.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

i don't understand how it's a boycott or how is illegal or unfair

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 34 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's not a boycott, neither is it illegal. He's literally just being a crybaby and believes that anybody not pandering to his business model should be forced by the courts to give him money regardless.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 38 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

How dare your company not advertise on my company cause I’m a racist wanna be nazi twat.

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 35 points 3 months ago

No better way to get people who used to voluntarily give you money to give you more money than threatening them.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 32 points 3 months ago

Oh yes Nestle, the infamously lefty liberals.

[–] aarRJaay@lemm.ee 29 points 3 months ago

Throwing a temper tantrum because no-one wants to play with you. What a child!

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 29 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Are boycotts illegal? In this case I doubt there was an organized attempt, just some companies making individual business decisions. But even if Twitter can prove there was a boycott, is there a law against that?

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Boycotts are absolutely legal, you are completely entitled to decide who you don't want to do business with. However, illegality is no longer required for the justice system to be weaponized against you, and President Musk just wants to make an example to others who might not want to do business with an actual Nazi.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 27 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Yes, sue literally every company in America, nothing could possibly go wrong.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago (5 children)

This donkey about to get taught a lesson by nestle. He probably thinks he's hot shit now but he poked the devil.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 25 points 3 months ago

Life goals, don't fuck up so bad that even Nestle wont work with you!

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 months ago

Suing companies for not advertising on a platform For Nazis, By Nazis™. 🤡

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 24 points 3 months ago

tHe mArKeT WiLl ReGuLaTe ItSeLf!

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 months ago

How is this even a thing? Is a bank run considered collusion? If the platform no longer offers the audience I want to reach then I should be able to stop advertising on it. It just happens that the audience of may companies at once left the company. Who is even entertaining this lawsuit?

[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (6 children)

i wounder if he will actually get a court to order that every person in the world owes him money.

cause that seems to be what he is working towards.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] cmrn@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

YouTube 10 years ago: we’re becoming as straight-edged as possible to keep advertisers around

Twitter now: Fuck you (wait we needed you)

load more comments
view more: next ›